CO2 makes up .04% of the atmosphere. Nothing to be alarmed about. Plants need CO2.
There is so much buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, scientists say we’ve reached a point that some needs to be removed. Technology exists to do it, but it’s costly, zany-sounding and not well known. That's starting to change now. http://axios.link/SDC4 pic.twitter.com/i8DWgvMhjd
-
-
-
This just in from the “Moron Report”.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There’s the crazy brand new technology called treees
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so why is it common practice to inject carbon dioxide in commercial greenhouses to promote plant growth?
-
To make it hotter. Thus the term greenhouse gas.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
More fear mongering by radical environmentalists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this is a world saving idea and technology, why would it cost anything? You would think that people would be willing to just make it happen without lining anyone’s pocket.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. Since CO2 is heavier than air. And plants need it. Hmm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trees, we need more trees, Less corn and soy beans which offer very little real benefit in comparison for what they do to the land.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plant more trees... good for the future generations too...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m sure
@Dyson is all over it!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this headline tho
#goldThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.