Sewer tests in Massachusetts lend support to this German study. As a Mainer, I will refrain from gratuitous comments on Massachusetts hygiene. But in all seriousness, the more widely spread the better.
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Don't we have more info/examples like this? Remember the cruise ships that were stranded off of FLA. The Pres said they studied the passengers on 2 ships that docked. We have info from the USS Teddy Roosevelt too. And there is another cruise ship full of passengers off Uruguay.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Could we do random testing now like Germany did in the town? Do we have to wait for the fingerstick test to start randomly testing? And how about selectively testing those who think they had this virus in Dec., Jan., or Feb. to see if those people have have antibodies?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Antibody tests are great for research, but dangerous if used to predict individuals' status. Let's say an antibody test offers ~95% sensitivity & specificity. If we extrapolate from Gangelt, using this test would mean that 23% of people would falsely be considered immune.
-
Test 100,000 random people. 15k will actually be positive, 85k negative. You would expect 18.5k positive results. 14.3k would be positive people (0.95×15), but 4.3k would be negative people with the wrong test result (0.05×85) So 23% of positive results out would be wrong.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Bingo! The title of my weekly research note is ‘It’s all about the denominator’ the study you site is discussed.https://ironsidesmacro.substack.com
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.