LIBERAL LIE: Judge Barrett has taken an “extreme position on guns” and is “opposed to banning felons from owning firearms.” FACT: Judge Barrett has faithfully applied the Supreme Court’s precedents to protect Second Amendment rights.
-
Show this thread
-
Judge Barrett’s entire opinion in Kanter v. Barr was premised on the fact that the plaintiff was not dangerous and did not pose any public safety risk.
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
The plaintiff in Kanter v. Barr pleaded guilty for financial fraud, not a violent crime. That hardly suggested that he posed a danger to the community.
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
The Left is hiding the fact that Judge Barrett’s opinion opened by emphasizing that violent felons can be banned from owning firearms. These are her own words:
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
“History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns.” "But that power extends only to people who are dangerous.”
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Judge Barrett’s views on the Second Amendment are in line with our Constitution and the Supreme Court’s precedents. The Left’s desire to eliminate Americans’ constitutionally protected gun rights is itself extreme and irrelevant to Judge Barrett’s qualifications.
1 reply 6 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Judge Barrett’s dissent in Kanter v. Barr correctly argued that it is unconstitutional to ban non-dangerous felons who have served their time from possessing guns.
1 reply 4 retweets 13 likesShow this thread
The Left should be applauding, not criticizing, Judge Barrett for protecting the constitutional rights of those who were previously convicted of non-violent crimes and have served their sentences.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.