You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The plaintiff in Kanter v. Barr pleaded guilty for financial fraud, not a violent crime. That hardly suggested that he posed a danger to the community.
The Left is hiding the fact that Judge Barrett’s opinion opened by emphasizing that violent felons can be banned from owning firearms. These are her own words:
“History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns.” "But that power extends only to people who are dangerous.”
Judge Barrett’s views on the Second Amendment are in line with our Constitution and the Supreme Court’s precedents. The Left’s desire to eliminate Americans’ constitutionally protected gun rights is itself extreme and irrelevant to Judge Barrett’s qualifications.
Judge Barrett’s dissent in Kanter v. Barr correctly argued that it is unconstitutional to ban non-dangerous felons who have served their time from possessing guns.
The Left should be applauding, not criticizing, Judge Barrett for protecting the constitutional rights of those who were previously convicted of non-violent crimes and have served their sentences.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
