If you walk outside and see that’s it wet everywhere - could you say with a preponderance of the evidence that it had rained? You didn’t actually see it rain, but you know it rained.
Didn't feel like suffering through Amb. Sondland's #impeachmentscam testimony?
Learn all about the lack of quid pro quo in 60 seconds 
pic.twitter.com/JLncIkDGRS
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Suffering? This is the best TV in years. Will probably have a better ending the GoT too :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Oops - you missed something! “Was there a “quid pro quo?’” Sondland asked. “With regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Trump never mentioned corruption in either phone call on purpose and specifically the Ukraine oligarch taking money into Russia 2B protected by Putin. Trump demanded a public statement, the WB blew and the money flowed 2 days before Pres Z was to cave. Trump wanted 2 smear Biden
-
No smear necessary. The fortune paid to his unqualified son while he was VP is enough in itself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice try. Fail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.