Those content with living with a nuclear #NorthKorea have argued that it can be contained and deterred like the Soviet Union during the Cold War. This assessment is deeply flawed.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So what do you propose? Attack them? This would cause thousands of civilian casualties in South Korea and Japan.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You gotta shave the ‘stache, Boltron.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Explain
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People like you, however, always argued during the Cold War that the Soviets could NOT be reliably deterred.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
go ahead make everybody's day
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well that's all the proof I need
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Deterrence is inherently unstable (the US and USSR came perilously close to nuclear war more than once). It is too late to do anything about Russia, but it would be inexcusable to expose the US to the risk of a nuclear attack by North Korea.https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/north-korea-the-case-for-preventive-war/ …
-
Deterrence with diplomacy worked with the Russians. WTF are you talking about? Prophylactive war, on the other hand, is proving fatal to local & long term stability. Examples; Iran, Libya, Iraq, Syria & others.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.