I read this NYT story with curiosity. Neither the NSC staff nor I have discussed or heard of any desire to “settle for a nuclear freeze by NK.” This was a reprehensible attempt by someone to box in the President. There should be consequences.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/world/asia/trump-kim-north-korea-negotiations.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes John there always has to be CONSEQUENCES with you. That's why the World is in such a mess because of YOU and your CONSEQUENCES. How about there are consequences for all your illegal wars and coups, the world would be a much better place.
-
The world will be a better place when this monster gets dragged to The Hague in chains.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps you and Pompeo are out of the loop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
How was Mongolia, John?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So this would mean Trump is legitimizing a brutal dictator on the world stage as a nuclear power.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The consequences are that our Dotard-In-Chief will do anything he can to give away any leverage he possibly has to win a newscycle. Meeting with Kim? Walking into NoKo? Massive wins for Kim, Trump has less to bargain with. The idiocy of Trump is astounding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol how was Mongolia?
-
Apparently Siberia was too busy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.