In terms of great bookings: one of the most famous people in the world, who's mostly been quiet during a time of enormous interest, headlining a session on the launch of your publication and what it sets out to do is an all-time great bookinghttps://www.glamour.com/story/meghan-markle-the-19th-represents-summit-interview-emily-ramshaw …
-
I'm sure Megan Markle is a fine person but her fame is based on who she married and that's why she's a headliner for this event.
Markle caps off a week of sessions with women who include Stacy Abrams, Hillary Clinton, Elise Stefanik, Meryl Streep, the New York Philharmonic (playing women-of-color composers), and several prominent professors in their field (women & politics, race & identity), among others.
-
-
That those women are the undercard is my whole problem.
-
It’s not Meghan’s problem that people aren’t paying attention to the others? Like isn’t that a bigger problem? Why are you pinning it on her? I hadn’t heard about this summit until Meghan’s involvement. Am I supposed to resent her for it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.