Maybe we need to go back to those systems they used decades ago--time delay broadcasts. They used to use that to bleep out when someone said a cuss word.https://twitter.com/AmandaBecker/status/1253687972228141061 …
I’ve been saying this for a couple years. People deserve to and should hear leaders even if they’re saying things that are false but a 60-second delay to allow context or qualifiers or warnings would benefit everyone.
-
-
I'd be satisfied with sound effects: we could all agree sad trombone is a misstatement, for instance.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The press is under no obligation to broadcast every word anyone says in real time. Newspapers don't print transcripts.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why can't people listen and understand for themselves? I don't need someone else to interpret unless someone is talking in a foreign language.
-
The media understands that if people are allowed to interpret anything on their own, they can't be manipulated into believing their lies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You have a cognitive issue if you have not understood last night Trump was asking a doctor whether UV light or doing injections in patient's lungs would be a solution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, no.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where can I get context for all of the wild journalism out there?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.