No one said it straight out yet. Retroactively altering your model to fit predictions is not science. It is the opposite of science. Climatologists are the opposite of scientists.
-
-
Munger-style analysis time! Consistency: people stick to prior beliefs, especially ones stated publicly Incentives: people adopt beliefs that provide reward value So, first who is incentivized? The organizations doing the research? The ones building green product? Hmm...
-
Climatologists realized they could get lots of funding by predicting the end of the world. It probably started as noise. Politicians realized they could oppress by exploiting these predictions, and thus a cycle was formed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.