No one said it straight out yet. Retroactively altering your model to fit predictions is not science. It is the opposite of science. Climatologists are the opposite of scientists.
-
-
When a scientist fits their model to retrodiction rather than prediction, they are an abomination.
Show this thread -
You made a specific, testable prediction. The prediction failed.
Show this thread -
Failure to accept the falsification proves that the models were never intended to be predictive. They were never science. That's it. Game over. You're done.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.