Background: if you can't screw up badly enough to get sued, you're not in any sociological sense responsible.
-
Show this thread
-
For journalists or scientists to be responsible, they would have to be legally liable if someone misused the information in question.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
For this to be feasible, the pastor or priest would have to be able to, in turn, sue someone who refused their reasonable advice on how to use the information.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Alternatively, to refuse to provide information. Otherwise all that happens is 'responsibility' outlaws preaching; misuse is inevitable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
(Good luck combining broadcasts with refusing to provide information.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
Responsibility is necessarily a personal relationship. One person must have grounds to sue another person. No merely legal persons allowed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.