For journalists or scientists to be responsible, they would have to be legally liable if someone misused the information in question.
-
-
Show this thread
-
For this to be feasible, the pastor or priest would have to be able to, in turn, sue someone who refused their reasonable advice on how to use the information.
Show this thread -
Alternatively, to refuse to provide information. Otherwise all that happens is 'responsibility' outlaws preaching; misuse is inevitable.
Show this thread -
(Good luck combining broadcasts with refusing to provide information.)
Show this thread -
Responsibility is necessarily a personal relationship. One person must have grounds to sue another person. No merely legal persons allowed.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.