LISTEN: The Pittsburgh synagogue killer used a social media site to express his anti-Semitic views. A First Amendment scholar told @AlisonFrankel earlier this month why the Constitution protects such sites from government regulationhttps://reut.rs/2Q6vByL
-
-
Replying to @Reuters @AlisonFrankel
Gab offers “free speech”. Gab uses an internet provider to host their services. That provider doesn’t like what Gab allows. That provider decides to stop working with Gab. Gab complains about censorship. Tough shit. The provider isn’t s govt entity and can do that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @bilarichfield @Reuters
yes, exactly right
6:34 PM - 29 Oct 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.