Use the Texas law as an example. If someone is broadcasting anti-vax propaganda, people should be allowed to sue them for damages.
-
-
-
Ooooh, this is a good one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Brilliant interview, Ali. You also managed to get my questions answered. I’m a J&J recipient and now waiting indoors for the go ahead to an mRNA boost not another J&J dose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do these science-based agencies not have awareness of or access to communications professionals?? (Rhetorical)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Three words: Use plain language!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was foreseeable. But risk was downplayed, ignored.
Physicians NOT social psychologists—they didn’t bring in qualified expertise
When dealing w potential catastrophic risk, NEVER assume best- or most-likely-case scenarios, ALWAYS ready for worst. Risk expertise excluded
-
And prepare people for changing advice, “this is what we are advising now, but as we gain experience and have more research, advice will certainly change”.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
See
@PeterHotez He is the real expert. Who teaches other experts. -
In the US,
@CDCGov and@NFIDvaccines are members of the WHO's@VaccineSafetyN - but their funding for and engagement with actually combatting misinformation is unfortunately far too low. We can do better.https://twitter.com/davidmanheim/status/1450031400493764613 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.