Technically, rapid discontinuous climate action is possible—but only in a context of widespread disruptive, even nonlinear, sustainability .
Every year we delay climate action, the speed of action needed becomes more rapid. Curves grow steeper—what I mean by "steepening problems"pic.twitter.com/pGiq9E9FKG
-
-
-
Any good account/description available of such disruptive change? Also why "nonlinear"? Delay means hyper-adjustment needed?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
as do costs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a key result of the warming limit framing, first put forth in our 1989 book (big file): http://www.mediafire.com/file/pzwrsyo1j89axzd/Warmingfatetowarminglimitbook.pdf …]
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's graphics like this that make me wonder what single-digit percentage of Americans could ask the right questions to grok it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's the whole point... no money to be made if you arent scared.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@EricHolthaus at this point any hope includes massive negative emissions by 2050. And even that would face major disruption. -
I guess we will be "thanking" 30 years of wilful stupidity for many generations.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.