It'll also help see why you'd class something as "bad" or "good", it'll reveal the inner workings of the book, and the art, and the theme.
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Like, most of my favourite criticism (of any media) is experiential. An attempt to capture *feel*, which can be 100% divorced from craft.
(I mean in terms of 'considering craft' here, but also I guess a little bit 'authorial intent'.)
-
-
Craft can absolutely be a good and useful thing to consider, but I don't think it should be a checkbox to be ticked in a review.
-
Not saying you're suggesting this, but: that closes off other valuable approaches, like crit-as-autobiography, momentism...
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.