And it’s done. Now it’s time to legislate to respect protect and fulfill the human rights of pregnant people. #repealedThe8thhttps://twitter.com/presidentirl/status/1042107838838059008 …
-
-
Agreed 100%
-
Yes, because those trans men and non binary folk have so much power in our society? People is inclusive of women & trans men & NB & anyone capable of getting pregnant, it doesn’t have to include cis men & the patriarchy. Including trans men and NB people isn’t excluding women
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny. We dont give men anything like the amount of privilege we give women when it comes to reproduction. Look at the panoply of contraception available to women, look at the dearth of rights for fathers, look at adoption law and abortion
-
It is tremendously difficult to produce hormonal contraception for males, because female hormonal contraception works by essentially exploiting (and expanding) the (significant) period of a woman’s cycle in which she is infertile. No such period exists for men. Prior attempts
-
to create synthetic infertility in males have very often perilously close (or worse) to permanently sterilising them. Re: abortion - gestation takes place in the body, and to the potential physical danger and detriment of - the female. Materially speaking, until a child is born,
-
the male’s bodily contribution ends when he ejaculates. There can be no compromise where one party wishes to abort and the other doesn’t. Unless you are proposing that a man can force his female partner to gestate against her will, then the imbalance in reproductive provision
-
between the sexes is unavoidable. Much like the greater physical strength and endurance exhibited by males, the fact that reproduction is manifestly controlled by females is unavoidable, if only by dint of nature.
-
Its not unavoidable at all. The state could simply give men a post-conception “right to choose”, just like women have through abortion and adoption. Equal parental rights could also be extended to fathers.
-
I’m sympathetic to this view in principle, although I’d argue that it doesn’t have much to do with abortion, inasmuch as the right to abort is arguably more - or at least as much - to do with not being pregnant as not being a parent. The difficulty with this, I think, is that
-
the financial abdication (since nobody can force physical presence, nor should they) of one parent after a child is born is realistically going to impact on the child negatively more than the other parent, so there would need to be provisions in place to ensure that the
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Razor sharp
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Intersex people and trans men get to be recognized as well, no matter how much you hate them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think
@AmnestyIreland is going against@amnesty policy by saying this.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Psst: trans men and non-binary folks are also very marginalized. So, yeah, this is an issue that impacts more people than just women, but those people's status is considered even less than women's. (See, all the women in this thread not considering them.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aye, because trans men are the REAL oppressors
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes this. Definitely this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.