"Race realism" is just the attempted reification of race through hyperstitional technique. The future will probably see a hyperinflation of intelligence in general. Economics risks creating fundamentally different growth rates for intelligence among different groups. 1/
-
Show this thread
-
Different growth rates would effectively create a caste system. Therefore, the natural result of current economics is a caste system. If it were a caste system based on something more substantive than an impure capitalism it might be justifiable. 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
The racial implications aren't even necessarily the worst aspect of this, more the general arbitrariness of the platonic question of "who should rule" being decided by the circumstantial victors of mixed market economics. Naturally, the alt-right/NRx seeks to exacerbate. 3/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
The question is also, what use are the less intelligent past a certain point? It seems like there is a cut-off, and it's entirely relative. Beyond this, only aesthetic value remains; humans become animals in a zoo. 4/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
So the questions of the coming aeon will be: who wants to be an animal, who should be an animal, and how do you manage an artificial teleology from animal to god? You can't put a level cap in, so you have to put a lower bound in instead, and try to manage things in waves. 5/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
We risk creating a situation where the greatest hand-me-down of the upper classes is literally time itself; where each subsequent wave risks living in the eternal shadow of an already established teleology. 6/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Each generation is already remade in the image of the previous, but soon time won't be just a Deleuzian isomorphism, but everywhere. A time war, in which the victors gain control over all of post-history; a war in heaven. For heaven. 7/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
And will eternity be trusted to generations of men, who perennially fail? Or will the first stable form of eternal governance become eternal? I refuse to spend eternity inheriting someone else's already colonized future, even if it means war on heaven. Even an unwinnable war. 8/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
But I am, of course, open to discussion, negotiation, and compromise 9/9
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.