people often talk about the tension between moral intuition and rationalist ethical frameworks but i think “money should go to the poorest rather than the proximate” is pretty intuitive to me it always felt right to me beyond argumentation alone
-
-
It's basically a perverse cognitive elitism from liberalisms perspective coupled with an even more perverse rejection of the market's right to value or devalue anything for any reason. I don't apologize. I have been tortured by the state.
-
The proposition the liberal has to argue against me if they are serious is that one's obligations to the poor are greater than one's obligations to those they have injured.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.