1) decide overpopulation is a problem 2) notice that addressing it outgroup-first is genocide 3) decide to nobly address it ingroup-first 4) notice that your noble self-sacrifice accomplishes nothing if nobody else is doing it 5) decide economics isn't genocide 6) ??? 7) PROFIT!
-
It's really overconsumption that's the problem, which of course means the best solution is destroying poor people in your country you don't like. They're sort of ingroup and sort of outgroup but really it's about accessibility. Think globally act locally!
Also I've said before but the extent to which such schemes are efficacious will ultimately reveal any zero sum tradeoffs in the economics of class. If you kill the poor and life gets worse for you, you were exploiting them. If it doesn't, they were hangers on.
-
-
we shouldn't focus too much on the poor. it's most of the managerial class that has no good justification for their existence. that's where the real money-burning goes on.
-
Agreed. I just meant there is a null hypothesis there one way or another, not that there wouldn't be noise involved or that other issues might not be worse
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.