The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA

Well I mean. There may be problems of leverage but I don't think it would be as bad as Nestlé

Do you agree that Nestle giving poor people a deal so good they cant refuse and then taking a extremely valuable resoruce to the community is unethical?

I don't think that's what happened. And I think if you're really the only person in the world that can do something, you deserve to be compensated accordingly. Just maybe not to a degree that causes privation in others.

Im not saying thats what they did, its a hypothetical. Water is a human neccesity and supply and demand shouldnt apply to it. Everyone needs water. It should be free. Why pay for something that i require to live?

Allocation problems. Efficiency is lack of waste, is better use of resources and thus better service to life. That ownership is deontologically bad is meaningless when the consequentialist functions of ownership are well defined.

But capitalism wastes materials all the time? A example when i worked at Taco Bell, we would often change the frying oil much more than we needed to. We wasted lots of mostly clean oil bc it was considered more efficient than to let it build up to the end of the day.

Capitalism isn't without waste, but in principle and practice the freer the markets, the less the waste. Note that this isn't really against collective ownership, just against lack of market feedback.

Well capitalism seems to have ALOT of waste. I think it comes down to this. The market must keep growing or things go to shit but we live in a finite world. We cant have infinite product to sell.