No. It would be a system that was mostly worker owned with competing private defense and law firms per early Rothbard, property rights, and a stronger tendency towards enclaves than left anarchists would prefer, but with open borders and fairly robust freedom of movement.
-
Nestle benefits from "private property' maybe im mistaken but IP stuff is like copyright ? And what does amazon have a copyright on that stops people from overcoming it? And how does walmart benefit from state intervention.
Nestlé has recipes, those are probably protected. Amazon has huge software and infrastructure services that are probably protected. Wal mart wouldn't exist without indirect subsidies via SNAP and other forms of welfare. All probably receive state largesse.
-
-
Well walmart did exist pre modern welfare systems. And yur thinking cookies and stuff but Nestle makes alot more through bottled water which is where private property protects them stealing local water reserves. I dont think anything amazon does is especially uniques so no IP
-
Yeah Nestlé is a case of rights mismanagement by the state though I think. The government is who sells them the water rights.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.