Majoritarianism is dysgenic
-
-
-
Replying to @Beton_brute @ancapquotes
The majority are midwits. Majoritarianism in practice mostly consists of a war on excellence, therefore it's dysgenic
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr @ancapquotes
Still better than one or a couple "excellent" ppl ruling over everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Beton_brute @ancapquotes
The quotation marks don't help, no
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Beton_brute @ancapquotes
Probably a culturally left anarchy that's adjusted right into AnCap territory by 40-65% or so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr @ancapquotes
So 50% into ancap territory would be something like minarchism yeh?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Beton_brute @ancapquotes
No. It would be a system that was mostly worker owned with competing private defense and law firms per early Rothbard, property rights, and a stronger tendency towards enclaves than left anarchists would prefer, but with open borders and fairly robust freedom of movement.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr @ancapquotes
Why do you believe in property rights? All property has come from some form of exploitation or violence so how can ownership of it be justified? I dont like the idea of ppl owning the pieces of land. Like i will walk and go on any piece of land i want lol.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
While there has never been a fully satisfactory theory of the origin of property rights, I buy Rothbard's fundamental analysis that ownership is at the core of all coherent articulations of rights. Therefore I cannot reject property rights.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.