Streisand effect motherfucker
Show this thread
@tszzl posted an easily searched info hazard then deleted it like a coward so I will repost: Theodicy of utilitarian "monstrous conclusion" entails that all worlds with positive net utility would be created by an omnibenevolent God. Individuals who suffer too much are p zombies.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't this basically the punchline of Unsong?
-
Yep, there was also an earlier ssc post about ithttps://slatestarcodex.com/2015/03/15/answer-to-job/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pls no delet infohazard, roon. Infohormesis depends on it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can God create the same world more than once? If so, why not pick the best possible world, and create an infinite number of copies of it?
-
technically the same world
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why the p zombies tho? As long as the net is positive, individuals that suffer a lot are allowed to experience
-
Guess assymetry of good and bad experience?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
under traditional classical theism God loves all modes of existence as instantiations of its form as pure existence, and so would preference-max by making all possible worlds, not just the net-pleasure ones this would also require p-zombies to be possible and idk about that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So the world where individuals who suffer too much are p zombies is created. But then a utility-maximizing god would also create worlds where those who suffer too much aren’t p-zombies, so long as net utility is positive, right?
-
Not according to the SSC guy, which is what I was referencing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.