scicomm is an A tier grift you get to launder the the gravitas of the scientists and the average person will never find out you didn’t really made research contributions
-
Show this thread
-
many will become bigger celebrities than the scientists themselves
3 replies 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @tszzl
Is celebrity really conducive to good science though? Maybe they are doing them a favor.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr
yeah in fact the opposite it’s terrible for good science the moment Einstein became a celebrity is when he really stopped publishing things of crazy value
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @tszzl
Some people are just nonsense shields/sponges then. Their job is to heroically take the hit to prevent GIGO overload in the actually competent.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr
yeah but like very few people get the gift of semantic immortality … where people remember your name and the things you said long after you’re dead and regardless of what it does to their careers I think the scientists are more deserving of it than the communicators
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Makes sense, but is unrealistic. It would be great if the best ideas lived forever, but in practice memetic longevity depends on a mixture of digestibility and signaling potential rather than on truth or explicit utility. Only within small cults of smart people live higher ideas.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.