Yes, authoritarians are very tricky. They subvert all manner of accusations.
-
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
they really only have one, at the bottom of the critical regress "no, you see, *everything* is authoritarian, so i'm excused when i do it to you" and people who *oppose* authoritarianism? "well, they take my freedom to be an authoritarian, so are at most hypocrites"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
yeah, by historically necessary conditions, you've predicted the right side of history
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
enough to be aggravated by his lack of reflexive criticism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
Ok, well the two Yudkowksianisms that are relevant here are: 1. It's fallacious to assume people with different opinions have extraordinary character 2. The amount of evidence required to raise a theory to the level of attention is already most of the proof of a theory
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
not sure how 1 has bearing, but i can address 2 (because it relates to his naive induction) positive evidence has no bearing on the validity of a theory- so a *bunch* of evidence doesn't prove *anything*- it's *thwarted expectations* that *always* raise things into awareness
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
His induction is somewhat naive but not as naive as this. I suggest rereading the appropriate portions of the sequences.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
uh, this is simply popperian epistemology i suggest you read conjectures and refutations (jk, you don't need to read shit, if i can't produce a persuasive case for it, i won't ask you to do laborious reading of something that might be horseshit)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I've read Popper Selections and Logic of Science, and so has Yudkowsky. I know you are referencing Popper. Yud directly responds to Popper, and while his responses aren't as comprehensive as I'd like them to be they do get out of the hole you're trying to throw him in.
-
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
can you reproduce them? or do i have to "do the reading", and just trust it's not a waste of time (i trust *you* way more than i trust yud)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball @Alephwyr
fuck take any time you want, i literally have to do work and not do twitter i'm fucking up my life with poasting
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.