hitler's intentions were good to him according to his "essential nature" (or his actions would be contrary to his nature, somehow) intentions/malignancy are a nop for reasoning about morality except insofar as you're judging actions-as-intended, on the intention's own merits
-
-
enough to be aggravated by his lack of reflexive criticism
-
Ok, well the two Yudkowksianisms that are relevant here are: 1. It's fallacious to assume people with different opinions have extraordinary character 2. The amount of evidence required to raise a theory to the level of attention is already most of the proof of a theory
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.