hitler's intentions were good to him according to his "essential nature" (or his actions would be contrary to his nature, somehow) intentions/malignancy are a nop for reasoning about morality except insofar as you're judging actions-as-intended, on the intention's own merits
-
-
the tu quo que is *literally* the last resort in this game, i'm not surprised
-
I don't suppose it matters since none of the internet is liable to survive as evidence, but the idea was really just to register my prediction for posterity
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.