The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA

This is just made up nonsense. You might as well be quoting Sartre or Heidegger

i start out by quoting popper, and extrapolate that into the realities of fallible people not succeeding in solving their problems not really sartrean or heideggerian like, i'm not talking about responsibility under radical freedom like sartre or some emperical-phenom like heid

I'm aware that most people who make excuses are making excuses. But you haven't actually evaluated the evidence in my case, you're just making an inference. I have information you don't. I understand the weight of my claim and am still making it.

what is your information? can it be interrogated objectively, or does your phenomenology grant you total authority (that also extends into the world i’m in)

No one else has ever demonstrated the capacity to interrogate it objectively, so in the absence of sane alternatives I have to act as if the latter is true

are you certain you aren’t conflating “objectively” with “in agreement with my interpretation”?

Yes.

insofar as your interpretation impacts the world, *all* interrogation of it is objective- mistaken, maybe, but just because you think your subjective interpretation is wholly under your authority, doesn’t mean it’s objective once it escapes