carbon fuels don't *necessarily* require death, either (i mean, except plants, millions of years ago, but that's not an obvious moral consideration) but biological scarcity, with quadrillions of ems vying for life, isn't necessarily solved
-
problems are soluble, but solutions aren't inevitable and tragedy will always be with us, because we are always creating new meaning that might not come to fruition and so you *are* creating meaning, your will is simply being stolen by your idea of "malignant reality"
This is just made up nonsense. You might as well be quoting Sartre or Heidegger
-
-
i start out by quoting popper, and extrapolate that into the realities of fallible people not succeeding in solving their problems not really sartrean or heideggerian like, i'm not talking about responsibility under radical freedom like sartre or some emperical-phenom like heid
-
*empirical
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.