cockroaches follow a biological meaning are... you team cockroach i mean, wholly diving into nihilism here is at least a position i can engage with, i love talking about meaning
-
-
Replying to @averykimball
I literally said I want to abolish biology. That is anti team cockroach. And I am substantially more nihilistic than most people, yes. But not a pure nihilist as you keep suggesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
ah, sorry i misunderstood (i was actually surprised, it didn't seem like you were *remotely* team cockroach, at all, in any of our discourse!) tho, i would argue that abolishing biology is a spook, too ems are biological- they require sustenance, and arguably would reproduce
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball
Sunlight or nuclear power don't require death though. The electrons are going to radiate anyway. The stars are going to die one day anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
carbon fuels don't *necessarily* require death, either (i mean, except plants, millions of years ago, but that's not an obvious moral consideration) but biological scarcity, with quadrillions of ems vying for life, isn't necessarily solved
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball
True. And I suppose there is a hint of wishful thinking there. But I am in hell, and refuse to abandon hope.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
dude, how much of your hell is a call to self-overcoming, rather than a call to overcoming some malignant external reality it's easy to be pessimistic when your locus-of-control is wholly externalized, and your will is always thwarted!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball
I can't not be transsexual, nor can I even modify my body sufficiently. If technologies emerged that made this possible I wouldn't be able to afford them. And I would still be trapped in a largely hostile society.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
here's a perspective: even three decades ago *we couldn't even consider that this might be a problem we should solve* we *create* these problems i'm not saying they aren't real, but if we solved *this*, another, just as dire would rise up, that we wouldn't even understand today
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @averykimball @Alephwyr
and this is *good*! the world isn't bad without us, it's only our hope and created meaning that allows us to judge it bad! the malignancy of the world is wholly dependent on our flourishing and greater power to expect better! the world be malignant is what we *want*
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
This is just wrong. You couldn't sustain a sense of meaning under the conditions I exist under. No one could.
-
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
and yet you're driven to solve problems with the solution of mind uploadingpic.twitter.com/kDcZMRWpmX
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.