The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA

There are subjective and objective domains and they are seperate.

which is which, tho are you saying that fallibility isn't a fundamental, objective problem, or different willing isn't a fundamental, objective problem

"An ye harm none, do what thou wilt" seems fine to me. But biology is fundamentally intermeshed with harm. You can't advocate biology and not be fascist. It doesn't matter that it's the status quo

we are literally in a crisis in defining "harm" just because it's obvious to *you* what harm is, doesn't mean anything- if you think you're infallible, you're mistaken

Everyone else's definition of harm seems to result in harming me. So I sort of don't have to care.

yeah, you can choose to not care about things this doesn't place you in a great position to make totalizing decisions about everyone's meaning, tho

My position is exactly isomorphic to that of others and only appears to be otherwise because you refuse to admit that current existence is constrained by malign frameworks.

i'm not idealist, so i don't ascribe malignancy to frameworks frameworks are the best we can do, because we haven't come up with better ones yet they don't actually have intentionality