the schmittian stance isn't the only coherent political stance if all you will *ever* have is what you have, then it makes sense but if, through creation, there is a better for all in a conflict, then it becomes absurd
-
the problems of biology aren't our biggest problems, tho- and solving them at the cost of being able to solve *other* problems (disabling the meta-problem context) would be.. bad (if you accept my givens, which you don't need to of course)
I think a system like patchwork or Archipelago but with simulations would be workable, and that's before even considering other possible arrangements I haven't heard of or that don't exist yet. I have a satisficing condition, but not yet a maximizing one. That seems sufficient.
-
-
well, i like the possibilities and the solutions that are enabled by virtual worlds, as places to do experiments i posit that they aren't the universal *solution* to fundamental problems, tho
-
Time will tell I guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.