human nature is the source of all meaning in the universe excising it, to better conform to your conception of good, is paradoxically nihilistic and authoritarian you are a person, these fundamental problems are intrinsic to people
-
-
Replying to @averykimball
This is not tightly reasoned. First assertion wrong, second assertion pointless (almost everything is "nihilistic" from some vantage point, authorianism is a bullet I'm willing to bite in this context), last assertion depends on a circular definition of personhood.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @averykimball
1. Everyone accuses anything reductionist of being nihilistic. But reductionism is a matter of degrees. Believing in one less "thing" than someone else doesn't make you a full blown nihilist any more than believing in one less god than someone else makes you an atheist.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr @averykimball
2. Human nature contains whatever the source of meaning is but not everything in human nature is necessary to whatever the source of meaning is
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
you're asserting your authorial prerogative to a final understanding of human nature and meaning, and from where it is derived you don't want to inhabit this tactical position
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
Look. Every second I exist is coercion. My existence is coercion. I don't care that my only consistent position is to answer back in the same terms as my enemies. It doesn't matter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
the schmittian stance isn't the only coherent political stance if all you will *ever* have is what you have, then it makes sense but if, through creation, there is a better for all in a conflict, then it becomes absurd
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
I'm literally trying to instate post scarcity according to the most liberal stable scheme I can conceive of.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
all conceptions of post-scarcity are narrowly subjective "scarcity", if it's a fundamental problem (which thank god it is), is what drives us to progress sacrificing all progress- *all meaning outside a definition of scarcity*- to solve a *sliver* of scarcity, is nihilistic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know what any of this means
-
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
what cost are you willing to pay (or cause other people to pay, which is the real question) to achieve "post-scarcity"? that's you choosing, politically, what meaning will be discarded for *your* meaning this is nihilism (if you even care about nihilism)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
The destruction of all self-described modes of authenticity that are inseparable from biology.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.