if chaos magick interacts with reality, then reality can be used to criticize chaos magick if chaos magick *doesn't care* about reality, it doesn't interact at all, then it has nothing to say about reality anyway... so do what you enjoy with it
-
scientific progress's "picking" is based on criticism the critical context in which we criticize can include a surprise-filled reality that can suggest where better theories might be created, or it can be wholly rational and derivable only from paradigmatic/fideistic assumptions
Yes but theological arguments all ultimately rest of revelation and authority and I have my own revelation and authority
-
-
right, inside that meta-framework, arbitrary foundations can be extrapolated into the rest of understanding, rationally anyone who doesn't fit inside that rationally derived framework can be considered a mutilation- a "degenerate" form of a rational ideal
-
*but*, if you wish to describe transformation, one cannot rely on static structures based on non-transformable First Principles especially if you wish to describe the transformation of First Principles
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.