new thing to be mad about: people irresponsibly suggesting theological possibilities that they well know are already solved problems but which people without that education and training might take seriously and so be led astray
-
there are more books in the world than one person can read anyway, I wouldn't worry too much about it. it's just when people say "theology" that's where my mind goes.
I've read: The analects The catholic catechism tao te ching some crowley some peter j carroll the bible bhagavad gita srimad bhagavatam the kojiki some random buddhist texts the konjaku monogatari shu the koran schopenhauer I dunno, I'm somewhere in there but fiercely independent