new thing to be mad about: people irresponsibly suggesting theological possibilities that they well know are already solved problems but which people without that education and training might take seriously and so be led astray
-
if you think the string of inferences fails at some point, you should be able to draw it out - and even if you do, it only suggests a new path whose end is the same "topmost layer" about which you are even now claiming to have made inferences about
It's all just layer upon layer of adversarial examples built into the human brain. The fact that people come up with similar nonsense repeatedly doesn't make it not nonsense, it just means they have similar brain architectures.
-
-
you're just digging a hole now
-
That's what they all say, and yet none of them can argue directly to any point
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.