That thing when you're reading reactionaries and you can't help but in the back of your mind edit the text and construct a better version of their argument. It'd still be *wrong*, but goddamn, at least it'd be less fucking ignorant to the point of even missing low-hanging fruit.
I have about 10 books in my queue to read before I get to Wark and Graeber, and probably 5 more will come up at random. I didn't mean for it to work out that way, but reading for the sake of writing projects comes before reading for personal edification/FBI watchlistification.
