The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA

I'm not sure what you mean. The domain seems anti-inductive to me.

science isn't inductive

Hypotheses aren't inductive. Science is generally inductive, at least until it isn't. And then it is again, just in a different way. Science is a perpetual alternation between inductivity and originality.

induction is logically incoherent, science can't work with logically incoherent parts it's more an alternation of *deduction* and originality

It's not really logical induction that's performed, it's statistical reasoning that resembles logical induction via similar but distinct things in cluster space. Logic is the dumb low fidelity essentialist simplification. It still basically works and drives things in most cases.

logic underlies statistical reasoning, if you neglect it, you have ever-greater drift from the Real

Big Yud thinks logic is a special case of probabilistic reasoning rather than vice versa, and I understand that perspective: certainly the real world is not easily cut at the joints with logic.

there's tacit cutting of joints in statistical reasoning- the categories and proxies used to measure into those categories are fundamentally logical statistical reasoning is blind without logic, and errors are impossible to identify without it