a generalized theory of "doing shit" over interminably "talking about shit" would be a transcendent Good
-
all ideas have the potential to be inconsistent with *something*, determining which side of the inconsistency equation is "better", and so should be used as the ground on which we reason, is the hard part
Right, but it's the "a measure ceases to become a valid measure when it becomes a target" thing. Everyone is chasing each other in circles. Nobody actually knows anything. The people that pretend to are full of shit.
-
-
i mean, that's why the only escape is to try to find targets that invalidate measures (science, baish!)
-
I'm not sure what you mean. The domain seems anti-inductive to me.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.