They're injected thoughts from the future. Shower thoughts are a meme which means many people were lying about them which means the simulators had to guess who was lying which means some people are inheriting thoughts from simulations from the future
-
why not? anything can be imagined, but without a criterion of quality about what *should* be imagined, why imagine anything at all? even solipsists and hedonists (tacitly) privilege reality, just the reductive, comfortable, parts of reality (their own cope)
Once you really understand the chaos entailed by subjectivism, you can only believe in rationalism, even if it's just the rationalism of a subjectivist; rationalism builds walkable ground that won't fall out from under, subjective nonsense about angels, gods, and ghosts does not.
-
-
Kierkegaard says faith is more solid ground than fact. I must conclude Kierkegaard has not tried both.
-
(classical) rationalism is foundationally subjectivist- and its “unshakiness” is *exactly* like the unshakiness of faith, another subjectivist moral technology kant’s a prioris are Idealist, after all
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
one can reinforce a bridge with prayer, but not build it whole cloth
-
not actually sure a prayer is good moral technology irt structural integrity
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.