The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA

Dual rationalist sins of assuming your opponents are abnormal and blacklisting the level of subjective experience necessary to raise a theory to attention which is already most of the evidence of proving a theory. Additional sin of not understanding how words should work

It's really not an attack or an assertion of abnormality, since any rational thinker knows enough about statistical distributions to roll their eyes at the idea of normality. But the attack against reason and biology is an attack on truth. We might need a level above sex/gender.

Have you read Yudkowsky? Do you know what I am referencing?

I've heard so many times "have you read this passage of the Qu'ran in its original Arabic, have you heard this pastor's talk" that any appeal to authority is ignored. If you have a point to make please make it, instead of name dropping.

So you have no idea what you're talking about. Got it.

Yes, that's what they say too. It's a religious argument, an appeal to authority logical fallacy, and the same kind of dishonesty I've seen a thousand times before. Most of the time people quote an author or a paper behind a paywall, they haven't read it themselves. sus.

Yeah mate you're following the script. Next stage is you call me a transphobe and block me. It's akin to blasphemy. This is why all religion is poison.