The AHA statement about Dawkins rejects the interpretation that he was pointing to an apparent inconsistency in the current norms of political correctness, while simultaneously providing an example of precisely the confused thinking that he claims he was pointing out. Discuss.
-
I've heard so many times "have you read this passage of the Qu'ran in its original Arabic, have you heard this pastor's talk" that any appeal to authority is ignored. If you have a point to make please make it, instead of name dropping.
So you have no idea what you're talking about. Got it.
-
-
Yes, that's what they say too. It's a religious argument, an appeal to authority logical fallacy, and the same kind of dishonesty I've seen a thousand times before. Most of the time people quote an author or a paper behind a paywall, they haven't read it themselves. sus.
-
https://intelligence.org/rationality-ai-zombies/ … You can get it for a dollar. It's only the collected writings of the preeminent rationalist of our time.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.