The AHA statement about Dawkins rejects the interpretation that he was pointing to an apparent inconsistency in the current norms of political correctness, while simultaneously providing an example of precisely the confused thinking that he claims he was pointing out. Discuss.
-
It's really not an attack or an assertion of abnormality, since any rational thinker knows enough about statistical distributions to roll their eyes at the idea of normality. But the attack against reason and biology is an attack on truth. We might need a level above sex/gender.
Have you read Yudkowsky? Do you know what I am referencing?
-
-
I've heard so many times "have you read this passage of the Qu'ran in its original Arabic, have you heard this pastor's talk" that any appeal to authority is ignored. If you have a point to make please make it, instead of name dropping.
-
So you have no idea what you're talking about. Got it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.