The AHA statement about Dawkins rejects the interpretation that he was pointing to an apparent inconsistency in the current norms of political correctness, while simultaneously providing an example of precisely the confused thinking that he claims he was pointing out. Discuss.
-
No one is debating your existence. There is a debate about the logic + ethics of redefining the categories of man/woman based on subjective feelings rather than anatomy.
Dual rationalist sins of assuming your opponents are abnormal and blacklisting the level of subjective experience necessary to raise a theory to attention which is already most of the evidence of proving a theory. Additional sin of not understanding how words should work
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.