Aversion to violence is an unwillingness to confront reality. The prototypical example: Animals eat other animals. You can say this is bad, but saying so doesn't create a pathway for it to become not so. Conscious acts are still embedded in systems of constraints, like all events
-
-
Knowledge of what an ideal game would look like is not evidence one inhabits that game.
Show this thread -
It's actually worse than this. The moralists think they are in a game where violence ISN'T EVEN POSSIBLE until irrational actors introduce it by confusedly playing as if their counterfactual game conditions were true. Violence is not even just suboptimal but total error to them.
Show this thread -
Think about nature honestly and ask yourself what kind of animal doesn't have a concept of violence as part of its world and perhaps you will be as offended by these types as I am.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.