It's not like there aren't other valid systems of math. You're just taking a small number of cases and generalizing that everything can in principle be solved this way. It's a circular appeal to the way human cognition works, not a valid inductive proof of universal properties.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.