The thing I hate about bayesianism compared to logic is that probability densities seem to have gravity in bayesianism. IE, if you're trying to figure out inert data the principles of sensible betting overwhelm the incentives to recondition on new information.
Logic is great precisely because it is assymetrical and these asymmetries allow construction of hypotheses that are wider than dominant probability densities. If you use bayescraft to construct your hypotheses in the first place you are just recursively destroying information