What the fuck, does Yudkowsky really think things like anticipation are purely referential and have no associated quale? That's insane. No wonder he hasn't accomplished anything, and no wonder he believes in nonsense like embedded cognition.
May have misread but I find Yud's obsession with use reference distinction as an essential map for ontological facts about cognition to be in general unjustified
-
-
I must have misread because he later directly attributes a qualia to an anticipation. I guess I don't understand his argument then.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.